Off to a False Start? The US Government’s First Attempt to Standardize Sizes

Life, January 15, 1940. Click to enlarge

Finding a sizing system that suits most women is the gold standard for manufacturers, retailers, and consumers themselves. During the Great Depression, the US government decided to do something about the confusing array of methods used by manufacturers.  Using an elaborate system of measurements, 59 in all, and over 10,000 volunteers, the Bureau of Home Economics within the Department of Agriculture took on the task of developing new sizing charts to represent the female population more accurately.

From July 1939 to June 1940 women from all over the United States were measured for the study.  Most of the volunteers were employed through the Works Project Administration, (WPA), a big depression era government program. The photo above, from a Life magazine article on the project, shows that they were a diverse groups–tall and short, thin and large.

But were they diverse enough?  The compilers listed a few problems, such as the over-representation of Eastern urban women. They didn’t seem to notice that the lack of women of color might have made a difference. But a big stumbling block that they knew from the outset was the dearth of older women.  “It became apparent early in the study that too many young women were being measured because older women were reluctant to participate.”(25) You can read the study, in all its statistical glory, here.

So what does this mean? Even though the authors acknowledged that body shapes changed with age, the foundational study for sizing standards did not include enough older women to factor in those differences.

The statistics gathered in this study became the basis of government fit standards in 1958, revised again in 1970.  No similar widespread study has ever been undertaken.  If you are no longer young, think about this next time your clothes don’t fit.

This entry was posted in 1930s, 1940s and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Off to a False Start? The US Government’s First Attempt to Standardize Sizes

  1. JS says:

    Fascinating. I understand the discomfort, but in a way, the vanity of older women deprived a government agency of the very information that might have led to better sizing for them.

  2. Jinon says:

    It wasn’t their vanity. Many older women dislike the way their bodies have changed, so they might be embarrassed to have someone take their measurements.

  3. JS says:

    Kathleen Fasanella, pattern maker, small sewing factory owner, and sewing processes analyst left a long response to this article on PatternReview.com. I quoted it, but the system did not post the comment. So here’s the link:

    https://sewing.patternreview.com/SewingDiscussions/topic/107941/4

Leave a Reply to JS Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.