Marie Dressler Fashion for Sears

Sears Catalog, 1939-40

Sears Catalog, 1939-40

If I could have one research wish, it would be to have all the Sears catalogs available in a searchable data base on line. There is so much to learn from these resources, even the highly edited versions in the series Everyday Fashions as Pictured in the Sears Catalog.  In the volume on the forties, I discovered these dresses named after the famous actor Marie Dressler (ca. 1868-1934), known for her portrayal of older, motherly figures. Thanks to experts at the Vintage Fashion Guild, I discovered that the line was created by the Gottlieb dress company in Ohio after Dressler’s death. Fashion historian Jonathan Walford tells the story of the brand here.

By choosing the larger, older actor as their muse, the Gottlieb Company and Sears were finding a way to sell to the no longer young and slim. Note the size ranges here. The dresses came in both women’s sizes and “stout sizes.”  What’s the difference between them? Women’s sizes were based on even bust measurements—going from 36 to 44.  The “stout” sizes were based on odd bust measurements and went from 43 to 53.  Was the ratio of bust to hip the same?  Unfortunately, I could not find a full explanation of women’s sizes that included bust and hip sizes.

In the product descriptions, the words “slim” and “slenderizing” are repeated over and over, but there are no references to age. I wonder if a young but not slim woman would be attracted to dresses carrying the name of a much older celebrity.

Dressler36LATimesAlthough Sears claims to be the exclusive purveyor of Marie Dressler clothes in its 1939-1940 catalog, that was not always the case. I discovered ads for the plus size range in the Los Angeles Times from 1936 and 1956.  The earlier ad is particularly interesting, because the dresses were offered not just in half sizes, but also quarter sizes.  The half sizes were for taller women (in contrast to standardized half sizes in the 1950s); the quarter sizes were “for the shorter woman.”  That means that clothing for the larger woman was available in three different size ranges in the 1930s!

This entry was posted in 1930s, 1940s, 1950s and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Marie Dressler Fashion for Sears

  1. bellneice says:

    Are the models considered “regular” or “plus” size? I assume that the 1940s model was not required to be as thin or tall as they currently are, and that there was no such thing as Photoshop, so these models are simply the regular variety. Which helps me make my point – even when selling larger clothes to an older audience, retailers will continue to use models who are younger and slimmer. Because in the heart and mind of a 60-year-old size 16, this is what she still looks like.

  2. Lizzie says:

    I enjoyed following this “group project” at VFG, and then reading both your and Jonathan’s blogs. It was almost like a virtual brainstorming session!

  3. Kait says:

    What a fascinating post! It’s incredible that all of this information can be found & researched with the internet. It makes me wonder what would happen to these little bits of everyday life without it!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>